Cartoon from here
The Gini Coefficient – Measuring Inequality
The Gini coefficient is a value ranging from 0 to 1 which measures inequality. 0 represents perfect equality – i.e everyone in a population has exactly the same wealth. 1 represents complete inequality – i.e 1 person has all the wealth and everyone else has nothing. As you would expect, countries will always have a value somewhere between these 2 extremes. The way its calculated is best seen through the following graph (from here):
The Gini coefficient is calculated as the area of A divided by the area of A+B. As the area of A decreases then the curve which plots the distribution of wealth (we can call this the Lorenz curve) approaches the line y = x. This is the line which represents perfect equality.
Inequality in Thailand
The following graph will illustrate how we can plot a curve and calculate the Gini coefficient. First we need some data. I have taken the following information on income distribution from the 2002 World Bank data on Thailand where I am currently teaching:
Thailand:
The bottom 20% of the population have 6.3% of the wealth
The next 20% of the population have 9.9% of the wealth
The next 20% have 14% of the wealth
The next 20% have 20.8% of the wealth
The top 20% have 49% of the wealth
I can then write this in a cumulative frequency table (converting % to decimals):
Here the x axis represents the cumulative percentage of the population (measured from lowest to highest), and the y axis represents the cumulative wealth. This shows, for example that the the bottom 80% of the population own 51% of the wealth. This can then be plotted as a graph below (using Desmos):
From the graph we can see that Thailand has quite a lot of inequality – after all the top 20% have just under 50% of the wealth. The blue line represents how a perfectly equal society would look.
To find the Gini Coefficient we first need to find the area between the 2 curves. The area underneath the blue line represents the area A +B. This is just the area of a triangle with length and perpendicular height 1, therefore this area is 0.5.
The area under the green curve can be found using the trapezium rule, 0.5(a+b)h. Doing this for the first trapezium we get 0.5(0+0.063)(0.2) = 0.0063. The second trapezium is 0.5(0.063+0.162)(0.2) and so on. Adding these areas all together we get a total trapezium area of 0.3074. Therefore we get the area between the two curves as 0.5 – 0.3074 ≈ 0.1926
The Gini coefficient is then given by 0.1926/0.5 = 0.3852.
The actual World Bank calculation for Thailand’s Gini coefficient in 2002 was 0.42 – so we have slightly underestimated the inequality in Thailand. We would get a more accurate estimate by taking more data points, or by fitting a curve through our plotted points and then integrating. Nevertheless this is a good demonstration of how the method works.
In this graph (from here) we can see a similar plot of wealth distribution – here we have quintiles on the x axis (1st quintile is the bottom 20% etc). This time we can compare Hungary – which shows a high level of equality (the bottom 80% of the population own 62.5% of the wealth) and Namibia – which shows a high level of inequality (the bottom 80% of the population own just 21.3% of the wealth).
How unequal is the world?
We can apply the same method to measure world inequality. One way to do this is to calculate the per capita income of all the countries in the world and then to work out the share of the total global per capita income the (say) bottom 20% of the countries have. This information is represented in the graph above (from here). It shows that there was rising inequality (i.e the richer countries were outperforming the poorer countries) in the 2 decades prior to the end of the century, but that there has been a small decline in inequality since then.
If you want to do some more research on the Gini coefficient you can use the following resources:
The intmaths site article on this topic – which goes into more detail and examples of how to calculate the Gini coefficient
The ConferenceBoard site which contains a detailed look at world inequality
The World Bank data on the Gini coefficients of different countries.
IB Revision
If you’re already thinking about your coursework then it’s probably also time to start planning some revision, either for the end of Year 12 school exams or Year 13 final exams. There’s a really great website that I would strongly recommend students use – you choose your subject (HL/SL/Studies if your exam is in 2020 or Applications/Analysis if your exam is in 2021), and then have the following resources:
The Questionbank takes you to a breakdown of each main subject area (e.g. Algebra, Calculus etc) and each area then has a number of graded questions. What I like about this is that you are given a difficulty rating, as well as a mark scheme and also a worked video tutorial. Really useful!
The Practice Exams section takes you to ready made exams on each topic – again with worked solutions. This also has some harder exams for those students aiming for 6s and 7s and the Past IB Exams section takes you to full video worked solutions to every question on every past paper – and you can also get a prediction exam for the upcoming year.
I would really recommend everyone making use of this – there is a mixture of a lot of free content as well as premium content so have a look and see what you think.
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 14, 2016 at 10:56 pm
INCOMESCO / Jesi
Excellent post.
May 4, 2016 at 11:38 pm
Tar Agrumi
You wouldn’t get a better result by curve-fitting then integrating. That would be *less* accurate. When you curve-fit, you’re approximating based on your points. An integral takes points on the curves and uses trapezoids or rectangles to approximate the area; the integral is the limit of those approximations.
Therefore, you’re more accurate to just add up the exact areas of your trapezoids if you have finite discrete data instead of fully continuous data.
The other method stated, to use more points, *would* give a more accurate result.
May 5, 2016 at 6:50 am
Ibmathsresources.com
OK – thank you for your reply !
July 9, 2016 at 2:33 am
Tim
Hi, what else could I add on to this for my math internal assessment to make it more complete?
July 10, 2016 at 10:39 am
Tim
How could I revise this so that my IA can be more advanced?